THE QFX SCORING MODEL
QFX uses a two-dimensional risk model. Every question carries a Risk Weight (1–4) and Risk Impact (1–4), producing a combined criticality score from 1 to 16. Individual question scores are weighted by this criticality to produce the overall assessment score.
Maturity Levels
Industry-leading, automated, continuously improved
Comprehensive, measured, regularly improved
Documented, consistent, periodically reviewed
Partially implemented, improvement planned
Basic implementation, ad-hoc processes
Minimal or no implementation
Partial Scoring Patterns
QFX supports multiple scoring patterns for real-world complexity. Linear Progression awards incremental credit based on how many correct options are selected (ALL7=100, ANY4=55, NONE=0). Critical Combinations prioritize specific high-value selections — for example, MFA for privileged accounts scores 50% even without broader rollout. Maturity Stages map to review frequency — continuously (100%), quarterly (90%), annually (60%), ad-hoc (30%), never (0%).
Multi-Framework Compliance
Every QFX question maps to multiple frameworks through ControlIDs (NIST PR.AC-01, ISO A.9.4.2, SOC2 CC6.1, PCI 8.3.1) and Control Measures (business-friendly names like "Multi-Factor Authentication" or "Data Loss Prevention"). A single assessment generates compliance scores across all mapped frameworks simultaneously.
EXECUTIVE REPORTING
QFX produces hierarchical dashboards translating technical compliance into executive language. The overall enterprise security score breaks down into functional areas (Governance, Protection, Detection & Response), each with business-understandable control measures. This enables board-ready reporting, multi-framework compliance tracking, risk-based remediation prioritization, and maturity progression tracking.