ISO 27001 and NIST CSF overlap almost completely
Both fully address the same 30 objectives. Evidence for one is most of the work for the other.
Map controls once and reuse them across the frameworks your buyers ask for.
Breach Watch, CVE Feed, Intelligence and Regulatory Watch now live under Intelligence.
The Verisq Control Framework is the control language under every Hub. Each objective is authored once, graded against each framework clause by clause, and backed by the evidence that proves it. Where a framework is silent, VCF records the absence and the reason.
Pick any objective to see what must be true, the evidence that proves it, and how each framework treats it, clause by clause.
Authentication is proportionate to risk, with multi-factor authentication on administrative and remote access.
Typical evidenceAuthentication configuration · MFA coverage report · exception list
6 of 8 frameworks credit this one piece of evidence.
| Objective | SOC 2 | ISO 27001 | NIST CSF | PCI DSS | HIPAA | GDPR | EU AI Act | NIST AI RMF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Governance and accountability 4 | ||||||||
| ▸Risk and decisions 4 | ||||||||
| ▸Obligations and compliance 3 | ||||||||
| ▸Data and privacy 4 | ||||||||
| ▸Identity and access 4 | ||||||||
| ▸Secure operations 5 | ||||||||
| ▸Third parties and supply chain 4 | ||||||||
| ▸Resilience and response 4 | ||||||||
| ▸AI and automated decisions 4 | ||||||||
| ▸Assurance and evidence 4 |
Both fully address the same 30 objectives. Evidence for one is most of the work for the other.
4 of 4 security frameworks address none of the 4 AI objectives. Passing those audits says nothing about your AI controls.
Every framework on the map addresses these, fully or partly. Get them right first: GOV-01, GOV-03, RSK-01, RSK-02, OBL-01, OBL-02 and more.
| SOC 2 | ISO 27001 | NIST CSF | PCI DSS | HIPAA | GDPR | EU AI Act | NIST AI RMF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | 36 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 33 | 30 | 21 | 24 |
| ISO 27001 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 32 | 29 | 20 | 24 |
| NIST CSF | 35 | 35 | 36 | 35 | 32 | 30 | 21 | 25 |
| PCI DSS | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 32 | 29 | 20 | 24 |
| HIPAA | 33 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 33 | 29 | 18 | 21 |
| GDPR | 30 | 29 | 30 | 29 | 29 | 34 | 22 | 22 |
| EU AI Act | 21 | 20 | 21 | 20 | 18 | 22 | 25 | 23 |
| NIST AI RMF | 24 | 24 | 25 | 24 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 28 |
Objectives both frameworks address, fully or partly. The diagonal is each framework's own total.
Complete onGovernance and accountability; Identity and access; Secure operations; Assurance and evidence
Silent onAI and automated decisions
Complete onGovernance and accountability; Risk and decisions; Obligations and compliance; Identity and access; Secure operations
Silent onAI and automated decisions
Complete onGovernance and accountability; Risk and decisions; Obligations and compliance; Identity and access; Secure operations; Third parties and supply chain; Resilience and response
Silent onNothing entirely
Complete onIdentity and access; Secure operations; Third parties and supply chain
Silent onAI and automated decisions
Complete onResilience and response
Silent onAI and automated decisions
Complete onNo family in full
Silent onNothing entirely
Complete onAI and automated decisions
Silent onIdentity and access
Complete onAI and automated decisions
Silent onIdentity and access
A red dot marks an objective this week's threat feed is testing.
Compliance evidence, vendor answers, risk signals, privacy records and Trust Center claims all map to the same objectives.
A 30-minute walkthrough on your own vendors, your own domain and this week's feed.