Your TPRM program is months behind.
It's not your team's fault.

What changes when the AI does the scoring

Five things stop being human work:

• Building the questionnaire. AI generates it from a description, mapped to NIST CSF 2.0 + SOC 2 from the start. No template-picking, no question-drafting.
• Chasing the vendor. The vendor responder portal auto-reminds. Save-and-resume, evidence attachment, signature capture all built in. You're notified on submission, not at every nudge.
• Scoring 200 items by hand. AI drafts every score against the framework. Reviewer accepts in bulk, overrides edge cases with one-click justification.
• Reconciling findings into the risk register. Failed answers auto-create findings, auto-route to the risk register, auto-sync to ServiceNow / Jira / Teams via the routing rule engine.
• Re-scoring annually. LiveThreat monitors the vendor's external posture every day. Drift surfaces immediately. The annual re-assessment becomes a confirmation, not a rebuild.

Audit defensibility

Every reviewer override, every AI auto-score, every implied rating accepted across mapped frameworks, every finding opened — captured in the Decision Audit and AI Generation Log with model version, prompt path, before-state, after-state, signature. Compliance Pack Export bundles the full trail in a signed archive. When the auditor asks "did a human review this," the log answers definitively.