High severity · published Feb 21, 2025
CVE-2025-0728
Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo HTTP server single PUT request integer underflow
7.5
CVSS
0.8%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before
version 6.4.2, an attacker can cause an integer underflow and a
subsequent denial of service by writing a very large file, by specially
crafted packets with Content-Length smaller than the data request size. A
possible workaround is to disable HTTP PUT support.
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High
Scope
Unchanged
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)0.8% · higher than 55% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
TH
ThreadX · Eclipse Foundation
before 6.4.1 · source: vendor
TN
Threadx Netx Duo · Eclipse
before 6.4.2 · source: NVD
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-0728
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0728
Patch
https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/netxduo/commit/c78d650be7377aae1a8704bc0ce5cc6f9f189014
Vendor Advisory
https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/netxduo/security/advisories/GHSA-hqp7-4q26-6wqf
More from ThreadX
9.8
CVE-2024-2452
Integer wraparound, under-allocation, and heap buffer overflow in Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo __portable_aligned_alloc()
8.5
CVE-2026-102757
An unprivileged, memory-protected ThreadX module can have the kernel read and write memory at addresses of its choosing, in privileged mode, and can use that to clear the MPU…
8.4
CVE-2026-102709
Improper validation of non-secure (NS) pointers in multiple TrustZone-M non-secure callable (NSC) entry functions allows an attacker executing in the non-secure world to supply…
7.8
CVE-2024-2212
Integer wraparounds, under-allocations, and heap buffer overflows in Eclipse ThreadX xQueueCreate() and xQueueCreateSet()
7.8
CVE-2024-2214
Missing array size check in _Mtxinit() in the Xtensa port